Skip to content
A to Z
On this page

UnderstandWhat it is, what people ask, how far this page goes

Natural inorganic gem materials · Trade name: colour / appearance variety · Natural identity; treatment status unknown

Pietersite

A trade name for a brecciated quartz aggregate with a cat's-eye effect; its definition, structure and origin are used inconsistently on the market. This page compares how the major standards and institutions name it, what must be disclosed when selling it, whether it can be worn every day, how it is treated and identified, and which source each conclusion comes from.

Price, rarity and origin are outside the scope of this wiki.

What this page can answer

This page covers

What we cannot conclude

  • Whether one particular bead is natural, treated or synthetic — only a laboratory report can settle that.
  • Geographic origin, unless an origin report accompanies the item.
  • Price, rarity or investment value: this wiki covers naming and disclosure only.

Material research: formation, causes and history

What authoritative sources say about how this material forms, what causes its colour and optical effects, where its name comes from and how people have used it. Each statement carries an evidence grade and its sources; it describes the material in general, not any specific piece.

How it forms

Pietersite is a chatoyant siliceous aggregate that has been brecciated and described as a brecciated form of tiger’s-eye, in which the parent material is quartz in its chalcedony form. The crocidolite fibres supply the chatoyancy, and the silica present is chalcedony rather than columnar quartz. Genetically it sets itself apart from South African tiger’s-eye: one hypothesis holds that it originated as a solution breccia, the crocidolite fibres being generated by late-stage reactions between hematite and chalcedony within a sodium-rich fluid. According to reports, Namibia and China are its only sources.

Scope: Covers an overview of the formation of pietersite (a trade name for brecciated cat's-eye quartz aggregates); its origin follows the "solution breccia" hypothesis from peer-reviewed/institutional sources.

Sources G&G Winter 2010 · G&G Summer 2025

Where it forms

Namibia and China (reportedly the main sources); formed in a brecciated siliceous system in a sodic fluid.

Sources G&G Winter 2010 · G&G Summer 2025

How it forms, step by step

  1. A crocidolite-bearing siliceous system is brecciated.

    Sources G&G Winter 2010 · G&G Summer 2025
  2. Crocidolite fibres are produced by late-stage reactions that occur in a sodium-rich fluid between hematite and chalcedony.

    Sources G&G Winter 2010 · G&G Summer 2025
  3. Aligned fibers are encapsulated by silica, producing chatoyancy.

    Sources G&G Winter 2010 · G&G Summer 2025

Link to appearance

The cat's-eye appearance comes from reflection off aligned crocidolite fibers, an optical mechanism; an appearance name alone cannot prove origin or material class.

Sources G&G Winter 2010 · G&G Summer 2025

Timescale

The sources in this record give no absolute age or growth duration for pietersite.

Sources G&G Summer 2025

Related base materials

  • quartz: The siliceous host of pietersite is a quartz-group mineral (chalcedony)
  • tiger's-eye: Pietersite is generally described as a brecciated variety of tiger's eye

Supporting findings

One hypothesis holds that pietersite originated as solution breccias, the crocidolite fibres being generated by late-stage reactions that took place between hematite and chalcedony within a sodium-rich fluid.

Evidence grade A

Scope: One of the proposed hypotheses (solution breccia); explicitly labelled as theorized.

Sources G&G Summer 2025

According to reports, Namibia and China are its only sources.

Evidence grade A

Scope: Stated conservatively as 'reportedly'; refers to the main sources and may not be exhaustive.

Sources G&G Summer 2025 · G&G Winter 2010

Recorded localities

Authoritative sources list the localities below; the list is not exhaustive.

Locality sketch mapLand outlines only; the map does not depict any national or regional boundary. Dots mark approximate positions. Base map: Natural Earth (public domain).

Africa

Asia

These are localities recorded by authoritative sources, not an origin finding for any individual piece. The CIBJO Gemstone Book (2022, §4.2.3) says a place of origin names where a gem was mined or harvested, is a matter of opinion, does not imply a level of quality, and that cutting, processing or exporting centres must not be used to imply origin. See the origin determination guide and the overview of recorded localities.

Causes of colour and optical effects

Pietersite's cat's-eye band is produced by oriented crocidolite (riebeckite) fibres: because the fibres run parallel, light scattering and reflection off them is collected by a cabochon into a single bright line lying perpendicular to the fibre length, which shifts as the light source moves. The direction of the eye therefore follows the fibre orientation rather than the body colour of the material.

Evidence grade A

Scope: Applies to pietersite bearing parallel crocidolite fibres; the origin of the fibres and provenance remain debated, and the mechanism does not establish any sample's locality, naturalness, or treatment.

Sources GIA Tiger's-Eye Quartz · G&G Summer 2025

Other research findings

The silica composing pietersite is chalcedony rather than columnar quartz; its chatoyancy is caused by crocidolite fibers.

Evidence grade A

Scope: Describes material composition and the chatoyancy mechanism; no other genetic hypothesis.

Sources G&G Summer 2025

Pietersite is generally described as a brecciated variety of tiger's-eye; one study proposes its petrogenesis is quite different from South African tiger's-eye, so this record does not transfer tiger's-eye's pseudomorphism/crack-seal mechanism to pietersite.

Evidence grade A

Scope: Defines the relationship to tiger's-eye and flags the different petrogenesis; does not claim a shared mechanism.

Sources G&G Winter 2010 · G&G Summer 2025

Limits of this research

  • Research status: Formation, occurrence or other material-specific findings found in authoritative sources
  • Pietersite is a trade/variety name, not an independent species; parent material is quartz (chalcedony).
  • The solution-breccia origin is labelled as theorized, not settled.
  • No absolute age or growth duration is given.

Methodology

Evidence grades

A
Standards bodies, government geological surveys, peer-reviewed research and museum records
B
Institutional educational material
C
Specialist databases or cautious readings

A statement is never graded above its strongest source.

This section is LumaLark's own factual restatement of public authoritative sources, credited item by item; it contains no verbatim excerpts, images or third-party logos.

DecideListing name, disclosure, care and treatments

Suggested listing name
Pietersite

GB/T 16552—2017 5.1.1 c)

Construction or treatment status

Natural identity; treatment status unknown

Related:Disclosure and cautions

This page cannot answer

Natural? · Origin · Price

A lab report settles these; this wiki covers naming and disclosure.

Related:What this page can answer

Answer at a glance

"Pietersite" is a market name rather than a mineral species name; before using it, verify: Trade name rather than a mineralogical species name.

What this means for you

Before buying, check the recommended listing name "Pietersite" and any disclosed treatments on this page, and ask the seller for a grading report if in doubt.

Known uncertainty

Last reviewed
2026-09-01

Trade-name ruling

  • Trade name rather than a mineralogical species name.
Suggested listing name
Pietersite

Care and wear

No care facts are recorded for this entry itself. Its parent material has care records: see Tiger’s Eye.

VerifyNames, standards, technical facts, clauses and sources

Names

Besides Pietersite, the name register records "Pietersite", for which no restriction on use as a name is recorded.

Standard and listing namesPietersite is not included in GB/T 16552—2017; when naming under GB/T 16552—2017, the basic name must be determined by testing; the suggested listing name given by this site is Pietersite. Trade and mineralogical namesThe trade name or synonym of Pietersite is Pietersite, listed in the name register as an English market name, on the basis of this site's ruling rather than any clause, with the identity tier trade name (colour or appearance variety). As for the mineralogical name, Pietersite is described as a brecciated quartz aggregate showing chatoyancy, and is a trade name. Names in four languagesNames are given in Simplified Chinese, Traditional Chinese, English (Pietersite) and Japanese; for Japan, the Japanese name shown is the entry's own, and the GSJ (Japan) wording for this name is not yet verified by this site. Institution usageOn authority wording, checking shows that the FTC and CIBJO texts on file contain no wording for this name; the wording of GIA and Gem-A is not yet verified by this site, and bodies without a recorded wording show the entry's own English name, which does not represent the position of any body.

Name register

Every name recorded for this entry, with how it is classified, whether it may be matched to this entry automatically, whether it may be used as a product name, and the clause it rests on.

This table scrolls sideways on narrow screens.

NameTypeMatchingUse as a nameBasis
no restriction recorded (1)
PietersiteEnglishmarket namematched automaticallyno restriction recordededitorial ruling (no clause cited)

How each authority words this name: see Names › Authority wording.

Authority wording

GIA, FTC, CIBJO, Gem-A
Pietersite (no wording for this name in the FTC, CIBJO text on file; GIA, Gem-A unchecked — bodies without a recorded wording show the entry's own English name)
GSJ (Japan) formal name
ピーターサイト (not yet checked for this body — the entry's own Japanese name is shown)
GB/T naming counterpart (this name is not in the standard)
basic name to be determined by testing (GB/T 16552—2017 §5.1.1 c))
Mineralogical name
Brecciated chatoyant quartz aggregate; trade name

Four-language names

简体中文
彼得石
繁體中文
彼得石
English
Pietersite
日本語
ピーターサイト

See also: Misleading and prohibited trade names · Supplementary name index

Classification

Origin
Natural materials
Material domain
Natural inorganic gem materials
Browsing family
Quartz and chalcedony materials
Identity tier
Trade name: colour / appearance variety
Mineral chemical class
Silicates
Construction or treatment status
Natural identity; treatment status unknown

What it is and how it's identified

Among the registered material facts for Pietersite, structure and the physical and optical items take the cited clause's values for silicified jade (including silicified asbestos, petrified wood and silicified coral, the whole class), not data measured for Pietersite on its own. Under the clause for silicified jade (the whole class), Pietersite has a structure (overall) of a crystalline aggregate, Mohs hardness 5–7, cleavage none, density 2.48–2.85 g/cm³, optic character anisotropic aggregate, refractive index 1.544–1.553 (this site's general note: the clause has finer ranges and the overall value is used) and birefringence not measurable on an aggregate; pleochroism is not measurable on an aggregate, for the untreated state; the optical effect chatoyancy may be seen; and lustre (as a quality factor) is vitreous, greasy or waxy on fractures, with silky lustre also seen in silicified asbestos, for the untreated state. Chemical composition, fluorescence, spectra and magnification are recorded under the clause for silicified jade (the whole class); see the material facts on the silicified jade entry.

Registered material facts

Each row carries its own source and check date and can be cited on its own; “—” means the cited source gives no value, not “none”.

Chemical composition, luminescence, UV-visible spectrum, infrared spectrum, magnification: these whole-class features are given in the cited clause for silicified jade (the whole class), so they are not repeated on the Pietersite page; see the material facts on the Silicified Jade entry.

Items below that name the class they cover give the cited clause’s value for that whole class, not a measurement of Pietersite (how to read class-level values).

Structure

Pietersite — structure (overall): crystalline aggregate

GB/T 16553—2017

Does this standard apply
applies to this entry
What this covers
silicified jade (the whole class)
Source & check 2026-09-26
Source
  • GB/T 16553—2017 Gems — Testing (GB/T): §5.2.6 (locator checked 2026-09-26)
Fact checked on
2026-09-26

Durability

Pietersite — Mohs hardness: 5–7

GB/T 16553—2017

123456789105–7References (diamond = value, bar = range; below)

Reference points on this site: Talc 1–3, Fluorite 4, Apatite 5–5.5, Orthoclase 6–6.5, Topaz 8, Diamond 10 (Source: GB/T 16553—2017); Gypsum 1.5–2, Calcite 3, Quartz 7 (Source: Handbook of Mineralogy); Corundum 9 (Source: GIA Gem Encyclopedia (care guide))

Mohs hardnessSource: GB/T 16553—2017
Does this standard apply
applies to this entry
What this covers
silicified jade (the whole class)
Source & check 2026-09-26
Source
  • GB/T 16553—2017 Gems — Testing (GB/T): §5.2.6 (locator checked 2026-09-26)
Fact checked on
2026-09-26

Pietersite — cleavage: none

GB/T 16553—2017

Does this standard apply
applies to this entry
What this covers
silicified jade (the whole class)
Source & check 2026-09-26
Source
  • GB/T 16553—2017 Gems — Testing (GB/T): §5.2.6 (locator checked 2026-09-26)
Fact checked on
2026-09-26

Physical properties

Pietersite — density: 2.48–2.85 g/cm³

GB/T 16553—2017

0.51.52.53.54.55.56.57.52.48–2.85
Specific gravitySource: GB/T 16553—2017
Does this standard apply
applies to this entry
What this covers
silicified jade (the whole class)
Source & check 2026-09-26
Source
  • GB/T 16553—2017 Gems — Testing (GB/T): §5.2.6 (locator checked 2026-09-26)
Fact checked on
2026-09-26

Optical

Optical effects on record: chatoyancyrepresentative example: cause in Tiger’s Eye (schematic)

Pietersite — optic character: anisotropic aggregate

GB/T 16553—2017

Does this standard apply
applies to this entry
What this covers
silicified jade (the whole class)
Source & check 2026-09-26
Source
  • GB/T 16553—2017 Gems — Testing (GB/T): §5.2.6 (locator checked 2026-09-26)
Fact checked on
2026-09-26

Pietersite — refractive index: 1.544–1.553

GB/T 16553—2017

1.31.72.12.52.93.31.544–1.553
Refractive indexSource: GB/T 16553—2017
Does this standard apply
applies to this entry
What this covers
silicified jade (the whole class)
General note
the clause has finer ranges
Source & check 2026-09-26
Source
  • GB/T 16553—2017 Gems — Testing (GB/T): §5.2.6 (locator checked 2026-09-26)
Fact checked on
2026-09-26

Pietersite — birefringence: not measurable on an aggregate

GB/T 16553—2017

Does this standard apply
applies to this entry
What this covers
silicified jade (the whole class)
Source & check 2026-09-26
Source
  • GB/T 16553—2017 Gems — Testing (GB/T): §5.2.6 (locator checked 2026-09-26)
Fact checked on
2026-09-26

Pietersite — pleochroism: not measurable on an aggregate

GB/T 16553—2017

Treatment state
untreated
Does this standard apply
applies to this entry
What this covers
silicified jade (the whole class)
Source & check 2026-09-26
Source
  • GB/T 16553—2017 Gems — Testing (GB/T): §5.2.6 (locator checked 2026-09-26)
Fact checked on
2026-09-26

Pietersite — optical effect (chatoyancy): seen

GB/T 16553—2017

Does this standard apply
applies to this entry
What this covers
silicified jade (the whole class)
Source & check 2026-09-26
Source
  • GB/T 16553—2017 Gems — Testing (GB/T): §5.2.6 (locator checked 2026-09-26)
Fact checked on
2026-09-26
CIBJO definitions
chatoyancy

Quality factors

Pietersite — quality factor (lustre): vitreous; greasy or waxy on the fracture; silicified asbestos may also show a silky luster.

GB/T 16553—2017

Treatment state
untreated
Does this standard apply
applies to this entry
What this covers
silicified jade (the whole class)
Source & check 2026-09-26
Source
  • GB/T 16553—2017 Gems — Testing (GB/T): §5.2.6 (locator checked 2026-09-26)
Fact checked on
2026-09-26

Each row's “Source & check” expands to the full source; the date beside it is the fact check date.

1.531.541.551.561.571.582.52.62.72.82.9Refractive indexSpecific gravity12345Pietersite

This material (RI / SG midpoints): 1.548 / 2.67; Closest values: 1Agate 1.537 / 2.63, 2Shoushan Stone 1.56 / 2.7, 3Changhua Stone 1.56 / 2.6, 4Bamboo Coral 1.57 / 2.65, 5Synthetic Beryl 1.57 / 2.69

Show the full chart (330 registered materials)1.41.51.61.71.81.922.12.22.32.41234567Refractive indexSpecific gravity12345Pietersite

Outside the full chart's range, drawn as triangles at the edge (RI / SG midpoints): Hematite 3.045/5.12, Synthetic Rutile 2.76/4.26, Rutile 2.753/4.23, Synthetic Moissanite 2.67/3.22

Refractive index × specific gravity (all registered materials)Each dot is one material's registered refractive index and specific gravity (range midpoints, not measurements); gold = this material, dark = the nearest few (picked on this site by distance in RI ÷ 0.02 and SG ÷ 0.1, leaving out near-identical varieties of the same species)Source: each material's registered refractive index and specific gravity facts (GB/T 16553 and others; sources on each entry)

Evidence and sources

Authority basis and clause sources

GB/T 16552—2017
Not listed the name does not occur anywhere in the text; scope: Chapter 1 “Scope” · Source
GB/T 16552—2017
Naming rule 5.1.1 c) · Source
CIBJO Gemmological Laboratories Book 2024
Not listed no occurrence of “Pietersite” in chapter 7; scope set by §7.1.1 “Gemstone” definition (Gemstones encompass) · Source

Sources

Further reading

Related entries and topic cluster

Parent entry and related pages on this site. Rows marked “Planned” are suggested new content and have no link yet.

Related-entry tree for Quartz on this site: 74 entries listed by this site's parent-entry links; synthetic, treated and similar entries carry their recorded state after the name; this page (Pietersite) is marked.

This table scrolls sideways on narrow screens.

PageContentStatus
Browsing familyQuartz and chalcedony materialsLive
Related articlesTo be added (placeholder)Planned

Who maintains this page

The material facts in the Pietersite entry are maintained by the LumaLark wiki and matched one by one to the standard clauses or institutional sources they cite: every fact carries its source (with a clause or page locator) and a check date, so it can be traced back to the original. The entry exists so that buyers and sellers can check naming, disclosure and material facts item by item.

Facts editor
June
Reviewer
Ralph
How facts are checked
Each fact is matched to the clause it cites; facts checked on 2026-09-26
Last revised
2026-10-12
Purpose
Lets buyers and sellers check naming, disclosure and material facts clause by clause.

Spotted an error? Report it on the forum