On this page
UnderstandWhat it is, what people ask, how far this page goes
Natural inorganic gem materials · Mineral / gemstone variety · Natural; treatment common (require certificate to distinguish)
Emerald
A green variety of Beryl coloured by chromium or vanadium; oiling and filling treatments are extremely common and must be disclosed in the name. This page compares how the major standards and institutions name it, what must be disclosed when selling it, whether it can be worn every day, how it is treated and identified, and which source each conclusion comes from.
Price, rarity and origin are outside the scope of this wiki.
Questions people ask about Emerald
Every sentence below is followed by the registered fact it rests on; answers add no new facts and promise no outcome.
Q1How is a natural emerald told apart from a synthetic or treated one?
Not by its green colour: microscopy is central, with multiphase fluid inclusions and characteristic mineral inclusions pointing to natural origin, and flux residues and roiled growth zoning revealing flux or hydrothermal synthesis.G&G Winter 2016Flattened gas bubbles with a flash effect mark clarity enhancement with oil or resin, and the chemistry is also probed with EDXRF in a professional gem laboratory.G&G Winter 2016According to the parent entry Beryl, a synthetic counterpart is commercially available.CIBJO Gemstone Book 2022 (via parent entry Beryl)Glass imitations exist: in one laboratory case a fractured green stone that looked like emerald was clarity-enhanced glass, with a single refractive index of 1.510 and gas bubbles instead of natural inclusions.G&G Spring 2020Whether one particular bead is natural, treated or synthetic — only a laboratory report can settle that.What this page can answer
Q2What gives emerald its green colour?
Emerald is beryl's green gem variety, coloured by traces of chromium and/or vanadium that substitute for aluminium in the crystal lattice.G&G Winter 2019Its colour runs from light to dark green, blue-green and yellow-green.GB/T 16553—2017Its pleochroism is moderate to strong, in blue-green and yellow-green.GB/T 16553—2017
Q3Are most emeralds oiled or filled, and does the filling last?
Yes: most emeralds are fracture-filled.GIA Gem Encyclopedia (care guide)Treatments with oil, resin, wax, plastic or dye are not permanent, so the stone should be kept away from all solvents, including dish-washing liquids, as well as chemicals and heat.CIBJO Gemstone Book 2022Light and chemicals can change the look of the oil, resin or polymer in fractures that reach the surface, or make it deteriorate.GIA Gem Encyclopedia (care guide)Laboratory reports remind readers that clarity enhancement can usually be removed or redone at any time, so a report reflects only the stone as examined.LMHC Information Sheet #5Oils and some resins can seep out of the fissures, especially under heat or pressure, or oxidise over time, so a trade association guide says sellers should be able to offer cleaning and re-treatment when needed.CIBJO Retailers' Reference Guide (2021) · LMHC Information Sheet #5
Q4Can you wear an emerald ring every day?
It is hard enough, but it needs more care than ruby or sapphire: emerald is 7.5–8 on the Mohs scale with fair to good toughness and commonly contains fractures, so the main risks are cracking from knocks and abrasion.GIA Gem Encyclopedia (care guide)Common sense says not to wear an emerald ring for gardening or other hard physical activity.CIBJO Retailers' Reference Guide (2021)Prong, bezel and channel settings call for caution, flush and pavé are best avoided, and heavily included stones or those with liquid inclusions need extra care in any setting.Gems & Gemology 1987 (Martin)Looked after, it lasts for generations.GIA Gem Encyclopedia (care guide)
Q5How should you clean an emerald, and can it get wet?
Warm soapy water with gentle scrubbing is safest; steam should be avoided because it can draw oil or unhardened resin out of fractures, and ultrasonic vibration can further weaken an already fractured stone.GIA Gem Encyclopedia (care guide)It should not be soaked in detergent, which may damage or remove fillers, and a soft cloth dampened with water is best.CIBJO Retailers' Reference Guide (2021)Solvents should also be avoided.Gems & Gemology 1987 (Martin)Heat can harm it, above all by extending existing fractures.GIA Gem Encyclopedia (care guide)
Q6What is the difference between emerald and green beryl?
The definition used on laboratory reports is a beryl whose green comes mainly from chromium or vanadium, at medium to strong saturation; iron-dominated green beryl with only traces of chromium does not count as emerald.LMHC Information Sheet #5According to the parent entry Beryl, beryl is a single mineral species, and emerald, aquamarine and others are its colour varieties rather than separate species.GIA Emerald Description (via parent entry Beryl)Whether emerald forms rather than common beryl depends directly on whether the chromophores are available.G&G Winter 2019
Q7Does a name like Colombian or Zambian emerald prove where it came from?
No: a locality name such as Colombia, Zambia, Brazil or Afghanistan is only a trade attribution, not a determined origin.G&G Winter 2019 · G&G Summer 1998Origin work is a laboratory exercise that compares inclusion suites and trace-element suites with reference databases for known localities.G&G Winter 2019 · G&G Summer 1998Because localities overlap and vary within a single deposit, the conclusion is probabilistic and may be only inconclusive.G&G Winter 2019 · G&G Summer 1998
Q8How do emeralds form?
Emerald forms when beryllium and chromium or vanadium meet through fluids; the classic model is beryllium-bearing pegmatites interacting with chromium-bearing ultramafic rocks.G&G Winter 2019Colombian emerald is different: it formed in an Early Cretaceous black shale-limestone sequence from basinal hydrothermal brines circulating along faults, with no evidence of magmatic activity.G&G Winter 2019No secondary emerald placers are known, since emerald is too brittle to withstand river transport and erosion.G&G Winter 2019Deposit ages span from the Archean, about 2.97 Ga at Gravelotte in South Africa, to the Cenozoic, about 9 Ma at Khaltaro in Pakistan.G&G Winter 2019
Q9What makes a good-quality emerald?
According to GIA, the most favoured emerald colours are bluish green to pure green, with vivid saturation and a tone that is not too dark.GIA Emerald Quality FactorsThe most prized emeralds are highly transparent, with colour spread evenly and no eye-visible colour zoning.GIA Emerald Quality FactorsEmeralds typically contain inclusions visible to the unaided eye, and the trade accepts them; they are often described as mossy or garden-like and are sometimes called 'jardin', French for garden.GIA Emerald Quality Factors
Q10What does emerald symbolize, and does it have healing powers?
There is no scientific evidence that emerald has healing powers: the UK advertising regulators ASA and CAP state that they have not seen evidence that crystal therapy can treat medical conditions.ASA/CAP guidance (UK)Its recorded cultural role is as the May birthstone: Jewelers of America and Japan's JJA list it for May, and the U.K. National Association of Jewellers lists it as traditional for May.Cultural recordsMuseum collections show early datable emerald settings in Greek and Roman jewellery, such as a Greek gold ring of about 330–300 BCE, and later in Byzantine work and 18th-century Indian gold.The Met 37.11.17 · The Met 21.29.2 +3
Sources cited in these answers ASA/CAP guidance (UK)
What this page can answer
This page covers
- How Emerald forms and what gives its colourFormation setting, process and timescale; where its colour and optical effects come from, each finding graded and sourced
- How to identify EmeraldIdentification points from the research literature; how far lab testing can go
- Treatments and enhancements of Emerald3 registered treatments: status, stability, how common they are and identification leads
- Caring for and wearing EmeraldCleaning, heat, chemicals and light, as the cited sources give them; durability indicators and wearing advice
- Hardness, density and refractive index of EmeraldEach value with its source and check date
- Emerald in English, Chinese and Japanese; national standard namesNames in four languages, the GB/T standard name and the suggested listing name, names in national standards; and: Which of GIA, FTC, CIBJO and Gem-A have a name for it on record, and do those agree?
- Name origin and history of EmeraldHow people have used it, with museum objects
- Listing and disclosing EmeraldThe listing name to use; what must be disclosed before sale; how lab reports word it
- Standard clauses that define EmeraldWhich clause defines it, each cross-checked
What we cannot conclude
- Whether one particular bead is natural, treated or synthetic — only a laboratory report can settle that.
- Geographic origin, unless an origin report accompanies the item.
- Price, rarity or investment value: this wiki covers naming and disclosure only.
Material research: formation, causes and history
What authoritative sources say about how this material forms, what causes its colour and optical effects, where its name comes from and how people have used it. Each statement carries an evidence grade and its sources; it describes the material in general, not any specific piece.
How it forms
Emerald is beryl's green gem variety (Be3Al2Si6O18); its colour comes from traces of Cr and/or V that substitute for Al in the structure. Its formation requires an unusual meeting of elements: Be is very scarce in the upper continental crust, while Cr and V are concentrated in mantle/oceanic ultramafic rocks, and the two almost never coincide in ordinary settings. The classic model has Be-bearing pegmatites interacting with Cr-bearing ultramafic rocks (M-UMR), precipitating emerald in phlogopite/biotite reaction zones between quartz-tourmaline veins and metabasite. Colombian-style deposits show that not all emerald needs magmatism: in an Early Cretaceous black shale-limestone sequence, deep basinal brines rose along thrust faults and reacted with black shale, forming emerald without magmatic activity.
Scope: Covers the various deposit types of beryl emerald (Type I tectonic–magmatic, Type II tectonic–metamorphic); mineralisation styles vary by type and cannot be extrapolated from a single locality.
Sources G&G Winter 2019
Where it forms
Tectonic-magmatic type (Type I): Be-bearing pegmatites/hydrothermal veins intrude Cr-rich ultramafic rocks (e.g. Zambia, Brazil, Russia).
Sources G&G Winter 2019
Tectonic-metamorphic type (Type II): hydrothermal fluids circulate along shear/thrust zones in Be-Cr-bearing metasedimentary sequences (e.g. Colombian black shale).
Sources G&G Winter 2019
Shared prerequisite: Be (from Be-rich rocks) and Cr/V (from ultramafic rocks or black shale) must meet via fluid circulation.
Sources G&G Winter 2019
How it forms, step by step
Be-rich rocks (pegmatite, black shale, etc.) supply beryllium.
Fluid circulation (magmatic-hydrothermal or basinal brines) mobilises and transports Be, Cr and V.
Water-rock reaction and metasomatism occur at lithological contacts or fault zones.
Emerald precipitates in vugs of quartz-tourmaline veins or carbonate-silicate veins.
Link to appearance
Trace Cr/V substituting for Al colours beryl green, i.e. emerald; availability of the chromophore directly determines whether emerald forms rather than common beryl.
Sources G&G Winter 2019
Timescale
Deposit ages span from the Archean (Gravelotte, South Africa, ~2.97 Ga) to the Cenozoic (Khaltaro, Pakistan, ~9 Ma).
Sources G&G Winter 2019
Related base materials
- Beryl: Mineral parent: emerald is the green gem variety of beryl coloured by Cr/V
Supporting findings
Emerald formation requires Be and Cr/V to meet via fluids; the classic model is Be-bearing pegmatites interacting with Cr-bearing ultramafic rocks.
Evidence grade AScope: The classic model does not cover the magmatic-free Colombian-type deposits.
Colombian emerald occurs in an Early Cretaceous black shale-limestone sequence, formed by basinal hydrothermal brines circulating along faults with no evidence of magmatic activity.
Evidence grade AScope: This source model is specific to Type IIB deposits and cannot be extended to pegmatite-related localities.
No secondary emerald placers are known, since emerald is too brittle to withstand river transport and erosion.
Evidence grade AScope: A boundary statement on emerald durability, contrasting with corundum placers.
Type I (Zambian-style) emerald is mostly concentrated in phlogopite reaction zones between quartz-tourmaline veins and metabasite.
Evidence grade AScope: Reaction-zone width and hosting describe this deposit type only and are not generalisable.
Recorded localities
Authoritative sources list the localities below; the list is not exhaustive.
Africa
- Kafubu mining district, Copperbelt, Zambia
Sources GIA Birthstones · Gems & Gemology Winter 2000
Asia
- Panjshir Valley, Afghanistan
Sources Gems & Gemology Winter 2000 · GIA Birthstones
- Swat Valley (Mingora), Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
Sources Gems & Gemology Winter 2000 · GIA Birthstones
South America
- Muzo, Boyacá, ColombiaColombia is the principal source of fine emerald; most output from Muzo and Coscuez, less from Chivor
Sources GIA Birthstones · Gems & Gemology Winter 2000
- Coscuez, Boyacá, Colombia
Sources GIA Birthstones · Gems & Gemology Winter 2000
- Chivor, Boyacá, Colombia
Sources GIA Birthstones
- Minas Gerais (Belmont mine, Capoeirana), Brazil
Sources GIA Birthstones · Gems & Gemology Winter 2000
- Goiás, Brazillarge quantities in the early 1990s; Brazilian output declined afterwards
Sources Gems & Gemology Winter 2000
- Bahia, Brazil
Sources Gems & Gemology Winter 2000
These are localities recorded by authoritative sources, not an origin finding for any individual piece. The CIBJO Gemstone Book (2022, §4.2.3) says a place of origin names where a gem was mined or harvested, is a matter of opinion, does not imply a level of quality, and that cutting, processing or exporting centres must not be used to imply origin. See how far testing can go on this page, the origin determination guide and the overview of recorded localities.
Causes of colour and optical effects
Emerald is beryl's green gem variety; its colour arises from traces of chromium and/or vanadium that substitute for aluminium in the crystal lattice.
Evidence grade AScope: Colour mechanism applies only to beryl emerald, not to other green gems.
Human use and museum objects
The collection evidence shows early datable emerald settings in Greek and Roman jewellery (Met 37.11.17, ca. 330-300 BCE; 1995.539.10a, b; 21.29.2, 1st-2nd century CE), later in Byzantine work (Cleveland 1947.178, 7th century) and 18th-century Indian Mughal/Jaipur gold (Cleveland 1966.515). The evidence pertains to the beryl parent material, not to this name uniquely.
Evidence grade AScope: Applies to collection jewellery recorded as emerald (the beryl variety) from Greece, Rome, Byzantium and India; the evidence pertains to the beryl parent material.
Sources The Met 37.11.17 · The Met 21.29.2 · The Met 95.16.13 +2
- The Metropolitan Museum of Art — Gold ring set with an emerald (37.11.17)
- The Metropolitan Museum of Art — Gold and emerald necklace (21.29.2)
- The Metropolitan Museum of Art — Gold, emerald, carnelian, banded onyx, and garnet necklace (95.16.13)
- Cleveland Museum of Art — Earrings (pair) (1947.178)
- Cleveland Museum of Art — Pendant with Chain (1966.515)
Objects recorded as emerald in these collections are mainly jewellery. Among the earlier are a Greek gold ring set with an emerald (Met 37.11.17, ca. 330-300 BCE) and Greek gold earrings with emeralds (Met 1995.539.10a, b, 2nd-1st century BCE), followed by Roman gold work of the 1st-2nd centuries CE (e.g. Met 21.29.2, a gold and emerald necklace; 95.16.13, gold/emerald/carnelian necklace; 20.239, a gold necklace with emerald beads). A Byzantine example is a 7th-century gold earring with emeralds (Cleveland 1947.178); a later one is an 18th-century Jaipur gold pendant with chain (Cleveland 1966.515). Emerald is the green, Cr/V-coloured gem variety of beryl; this record is not an independent material and the evidence above pertains to the beryl parent material. Design watercolours (e.g. the 53.626 group) and "emerald green" jadeite (acc. 02.18.733) are not emerald objects and are excluded.
Sources The Met 37.11.17 · The Met 1995.539.10a, b · The Met 21.29.2 +4
- The Metropolitan Museum of Art — Gold ring set with an emerald (37.11.17)
- The Metropolitan Museum of Art — Pair of gold earrings with dolphins' heads with emerald, glass, and gold beads (1995.539.10a, b)
- The Metropolitan Museum of Art — Gold and emerald necklace (21.29.2)
- The Metropolitan Museum of Art — Gold, emerald, carnelian, banded onyx, and garnet necklace (95.16.13)
- The Metropolitan Museum of Art — Gold necklace with emerald and variscite beads (20.239)
- Cleveland Museum of Art — Earrings (pair) (1947.178)
- Cleveland Museum of Art — Pendant with Chain (1966.515)
Scope: A museum object evidences only the existence and date of that artefact itself; it does not establish widespread ancient use of the material, nor does it attest the origin, naturalness, or treatment of any modern specimen.
Objects cited
- The Met 37.11.17Gold, emerald
- The Met 1995.539.10a, bGold, emerald and banded glass
- The Met 21.29.2Gold, emerald
- The Met 95.16.13Gold, emerald, carnelian, banded onyx, with central cabochon garnet
- The Met 20.239Gold, emerald, and variscite
- Cleveland Museum of Art 1947.178gold, pearls, glass, and emeralds
- Cleveland Museum of Art 1966.515Gold, emerald, diamonds, enamel, and pearl
Cultural records for this material: Birthstone list.
How it is identified
Emerald cannot be certified natural, synthetic or treated from its green colour. Microscopy is central: multiphase fluid inclusions and characteristic mineral inclusions indicate natural origin, flux residues and roiled growth zoning reveal flux or hydrothermal synthesis, and flattened gas bubbles with a flash effect mark clarity enhancement with oil or resin. The chemistry of these stones is also probed with EDXRF. These methods demand a professional gem laboratory, and the conclusion should be issued by a qualified body.
Evidence grade AScope: Applies to the beryl group; separating natural, synthetic and treated material requires microscopic and chemical testing at a qualified gem laboratory, and is not a self-identification method.
Emerald is often priced on locality, with goods traded under names such as Colombia, Zambia, Brazil or Afghanistan; emerald is also commonly clarity-treated. A locality name, however, is only a trade attribution and is not a determined origin. Origin work is a laboratory exercise: the deposit type is addressed first, then inclusion suites and trace-element suites (measured by methods such as laser ablation ICP-MS) are compared with reference databases for known localities to yield a conclusion of consistency or inconsistency with a source. Because the characteristic ranges of different localities overlap and vary within a single deposit, the conclusion is probabilistic and may be only inconclusive; heating, filling and diffusion alter the measurable features and must be excluded first. Origin cannot be inferred from appearance or name; an origin conclusion must be issued by a qualified laboratory for a specific specimen. This entry offers no self-test criteria or thresholds.
Evidence grade AScope: Origin cannot be inferred from appearance or name; an origin conclusion must be issued by a qualified laboratory for a specific specimen, and this entry provides no self-test criteria or thresholds.
In one laboratory case, a green step-cut stone that resembled emerald, complete with large fractures, proved to be clarity-enhanced manufactured glass: its single refractive index of 1.510 did not fit emerald's double refraction, and the microscope showed rounded gas bubbles in the body and flattened gas bubbles in the surface-reaching fractures instead of natural inclusions.
Evidence grade AScope: Describes identification features reported by a laboratory or educational source; it is not a test that a reader can rely on, and any single piece can only be identified by a gemmological laboratory.
Sources G&G Spring 2020
Other research findings
The GIA sources cited here record no size superlative for emerald. The beryl-group figures given by the 1988 article are a 2,594 ct aquamarine and a 2,054 ct green-gold beryl; neither is emerald.
Evidence grade AScope: States that the sources give no emerald record and that the beryl-group figures are an aquamarine and a green-gold beryl. Records change over time; limited to the source year (1988).
Sources G&G Spring 1988
The most favoured emerald colours are bluish green to pure green, with vivid saturation and a tone that is not too dark; the most prized emeralds are highly transparent, with colour spread evenly and no eye-visible colour zoning.
Evidence grade BScope: Quality factors as described by one educational source; not a grading standard and not a statement about the value of any piece.
Sources GIA Emerald Quality Factors
Emeralds typically contain inclusions visible to the unaided eye, and the trade accepts them; these inclusions are often described as mossy or garden-like and are sometimes called 'jardin', French for garden.
Evidence grade BScope: Quality factors as described by one educational source; not a grading standard and not a statement about the value of any piece.
Sources GIA Emerald Quality Factors
Oils and some resins used to fill emerald fissures can seep out, especially under heat or pressure, and others can oxidise over time, so a trade association guide says sellers should be able to offer cleaning and re-treatment of an emerald when needed. Laboratory report wording also anticipates residues of oils or resins left in fissures after 'cleaning' or through deterioration.
Evidence grade BScope: Describes what a trade association guide and a laboratory harmonisation body say about filled emeralds; it is not an instruction to have any stone re-treated, and whether a given emerald is filled, and with what, can only be established by laboratory testing.
Sources CIBJO Retailers' Reference Guide (2021) · LMHC Information Sheet #5
Limits of this research
- Research status: Formation, occurrence or other material-specific findings found in authoritative sources
- Emerald deposits are diverse; this record relies on a single GIA review synthesis and does not verify every locality detail.
- The 'classic' and 'Colombian' models are parallel mechanisms and must not be applied interchangeably.
- Synthetics and oiling treatments of emerald are outside the formation scope.
Methodology
- Origin determination and its limits
- Quality grading and value factors
- How gemmology became a technical discipline
Evidence grades
- A
- Standards bodies, government geological surveys, peer-reviewed research and museum records
- B
- Institutional educational material
- C
- Specialist databases or cautious readings
A statement is never graded above its strongest source.
This section is LumaLark's own factual restatement of public authoritative sources, credited item by item; it contains no verbatim excerpts, images or third-party logos.
DecideListing name, disclosure, care and treatments
- Suggested listing name
- Emerald
GB/T 16552—2017 Table A.1 “Emerald” · CIBJO Gemmological Laboratories Book 2024 §7.2.1.82 “Emerald”
Construction or treatment status
Natural; treatment common (require certificate to distinguish)
Treatments recorded for this material: Filled / Fracture-filled, Dyed, Coated
Related:Disclosure and cautions
This page cannot answer
Natural? · Origin · Price
A lab report settles these; this wiki covers naming and disclosure.
Related:What this page can answer
Answer at a glance
Emerald is often subjected to filling. Under GB/T 16552-2017, filling is graded by the material used, and must be stated in the name wherever it counts as a treatment (§5.4.1, Table 1). Do not assume it is unenhanced.
What this means for you
Before buying, check the recommended listing name "Emerald" and any disclosed treatments on this page, and ask the seller for a grading report if in doubt.
Known uncertainty
- See “Disclosure and cautions” above
- Disclosure rules for the treatments above can change as authorities update their standards; re-check before relying on this page.
- Last reviewed
- 2026-09-01
Care and wear
Normal care for every gemstone (CIBJO Gemstone Book §6.1), in brief:
- Handle it gently.
- Store pieces apart when not worn, so they cannot scratch each other.
- Clean with warm soapy water and a soft brush.
- Use ultrasonic cleaners only with caution.
The §6.1 wording and the full list of §6.2 special-care letters cited on this page are on the general gem care page.
Care
care (cleaning)4 sources compared
Emerald — care (cleaning): Do not soak it in detergent, for the same reason as with ultrasonic cleaning (fillers may be damaged or lost); a soft cloth dampened with water is best.
CIBJO Retailers' Reference Guide (2021)
- Treatment state
- any treatment state
Source & check 2026-09-26
- Source
- CIBJO Retailers' Reference Guide — Gemstones (November 2021) (CIBJO): p.20, Emerald chapter, “Cutting, care and cleaning” (locator checked 2026-09-26)
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-26
Emerald — care (cleaning): Warm soapy water with gentle scrubbing is safest; avoid steam, which can draw oil or unhardened resin out of fractures; most emeralds are fracture-filled, and ultrasonic vibration can further weaken a stone that is already fractured.
GIA Gem Encyclopedia (care guide)
- Treatment state
- any treatment state
Source & check 2026-09-26
- Source
- GIA Gem Encyclopedia — Emerald Care and Cleaning Guide: Section “Cleaning” (locator checked 2026-09-26)
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-26
Emerald — care (cleaning): Some stones are susceptible to damage from ultrasonic cleaning. Do not expose them to ultrasonic cleaning.
CIBJO Gemstone Book 2022
CIBJO Gemstone Book §6.2:special-care code j
- Treatment state
- any treatment state
Source & check 2026-09-25
- Source
- CIBJO Blue Book — Official Gemstone Book (Coloured Stone Commission 2022) (CIBJO): §8 Annex C, Emerald, p.35; §6.2 j (locator checked 2026-09-25)
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-25
Emerald — care (cleaning): ultrasonic and steamer: avoid; note: avoid solvents.
Gems & Gemology 1987 (Martin)
- Treatment state
- untreated
Source & check 2026-09-26
- Source
- Martin, “Gemstone Durability: Design to Display”, Gems & Gemology, Summer 1987: pp.66–67 fold-out chart, Emerald row, CLEANING column (locator checked 2026-09-26)
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-26
Emerald — care (heat): Heat can harm it, above all by extending existing fractures.
GIA Gem Encyclopedia (care guide)
- Treatment state
- any treatment state
Source & check 2026-09-26
- Source
- GIA Gem Encyclopedia — Emerald Care and Cleaning Guide: Section “Stability” (locator checked 2026-09-26)
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-26
Emerald — care (light): Light and chemicals can change the look of the oil, resin or polymer used to fill fractures that reach the surface, or make it deteriorate.
GIA Gem Encyclopedia (care guide)
- Treatment state
- treated
- Only after these treatments
- fissure filling with oil, fissure filling with resin
Source & check 2026-09-26
- Source
- GIA Gem Encyclopedia — Emerald Care and Cleaning Guide: Section “Stability” (locator checked 2026-09-26)
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-26
Emerald — care (chemicals): Treatments with dye, oil, resin, wax or plastic are not permanent; keep it away from all solvents (including dish-washing liquids), chemicals and heat.
CIBJO Gemstone Book 2022
CIBJO Gemstone Book §6.2:special-care code k
- Treatment state
- treated
Source & check 2026-09-25
- Source
- CIBJO Blue Book — Official Gemstone Book (Coloured Stone Commission 2022) (CIBJO): §8 Annex C, Emerald, p.35; §6.2 k (locator checked 2026-09-25)
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-25
Emerald — care (chemicals): Glass, plastic or hardened-resin fillers in cavities or fractures can be scratched more readily than the stone around them, or be more easily damaged by heat or some acids (e.g. hydrofluoric); keep it away from all chemicals, heat and abrasives.
CIBJO Gemstone Book 2022
CIBJO Gemstone Book §6.2:special-care code l
- Treatment state
- treated
- Only after these treatments
- fissure filling with resin
Source & check 2026-09-25
- Source
- CIBJO Blue Book — Official Gemstone Book (Coloured Stone Commission 2022) (CIBJO): §8 Annex C, Emerald, p.35; §6.2 l (locator checked 2026-09-25)
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-25
care (wear)3 sources compared
Emerald — care (wear): Common sense says not to wear an emerald ring for gardening or other hard physical activity.
CIBJO Retailers' Reference Guide (2021)
- Treatment state
- any treatment state
Source & check 2026-09-26
- Source
- CIBJO Retailers' Reference Guide — Gemstones (November 2021) (CIBJO): p.20, Emerald chapter, “Cutting, care and cleaning” (locator checked 2026-09-26)
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-26
Emerald — care (wear): Mohs 7.5 to 8 with fair to good toughness, so it needs more care in wear than ruby or sapphire; looked after, it lasts for generations.
GIA Gem Encyclopedia (care guide)
- Treatment state
- any treatment state
Source & check 2026-09-26
- Source
- GIA Gem Encyclopedia — Emerald Care and Cleaning Guide: Section “Hardness and toughness” (locator checked 2026-09-26)
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-26
Emerald — care (wear): cleaves or fractures easily or is brittle (e.g. rubbed facet edges); wear with care.
CIBJO Gemstone Book 2022
CIBJO Gemstone Book §6.2:special-care code b
- Treatment state
- any treatment state
Source & check 2026-09-25
- Source
- CIBJO Blue Book — Official Gemstone Book (Coloured Stone Commission 2022) (CIBJO): §8 Annex C, Emerald, p.35; §6.2 b (locator checked 2026-09-25)
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-25
Emerald — care (special care): dyed with colouring agents: special care (SC); avoid sudden temperature changes.
AGTA Gemstone Information Manual, 17th ed.
- Treatment state
- treated
- Only after these treatments
- dyeing
Source & check 2026-09-26
- Source
- AGTA Gemstone Information Manual, 17th edition (August 2026) (AGTA): p.X, Gemstone Information Chart, Emerald D, CARE REQUIRED / SPECIAL ADVICE (locator checked 2026-09-26)
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-26
Emerald — care (special care): colourless oil, wax or resin in fissures: special care (SC); avoid sudden temperature changes.
AGTA Gemstone Information Manual, 17th ed.
- Treatment state
- treated
- Only after these treatments
- fissure filling with oil, fissure filling with resin
Source & check 2026-09-26
- Source
- AGTA Gemstone Information Manual, 17th edition (August 2026) (AGTA): p.X, Gemstone Information Chart, Emerald O, CARE REQUIRED / SPECIAL ADVICE (locator checked 2026-09-26)
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-26
care (setting)2 sources compared
Emerald — care (setting): Check pointed corners closely for durability; such stones are better in earrings, pins or pendants than in rings, to spare the points.
CIBJO Retailers' Reference Guide (2021)
- Treatment state
- any treatment state
Source & check 2026-09-26
- Source
- CIBJO Retailers' Reference Guide — Gemstones (November 2021) (CIBJO): p.20, Emerald chapter, “Cutting, care and cleaning” (locator checked 2026-09-26)
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-26
Emerald — care (setting): prong, bezel and channel: use caution; flush and pavé: avoid; note: heavily included stones or those with liquid inclusions need extra care in any setting.
Gems & Gemology 1987 (Martin)
- Treatment state
- untreated
Source & check 2026-09-26
- Source
- Martin, “Gemstone Durability: Design to Display”, Gems & Gemology, Summer 1987: pp.66–67 fold-out chart, Emerald row, SETTING column (locator checked 2026-09-26)
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-26
Emerald — care (repair): polishing: use caution; jeweller's torch, pickle pot and thermal shock: avoid; note: avoid heat, which may crack or break it; polishing compound can work into surface-reaching fractures.
Gems & Gemology 1987 (Martin)
- Treatment state
- untreated
Source & check 2026-09-26
- Source
- Martin, “Gemstone Durability: Design to Display”, Gems & Gemology, Summer 1987: pp.66–67 fold-out chart, Emerald row, REPAIR column (locator checked 2026-09-26)
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-26
Emerald — care (display): heat in the display case, sunlight and artificial light: relatively safe.
Gems & Gemology 1987 (Martin)
- Treatment state
- untreated
Source & check 2026-09-26
- Source
- Martin, “Gemstone Durability: Design to Display”, Gems & Gemology, Summer 1987: pp.66–67 fold-out chart, Emerald row, DISPLAY column (locator checked 2026-09-26)
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-26
Each row's “Source & check” expands to the full source; the date beside it is the fact check date.
Common care questions and matching entries
CleaningCleaning Emerald: the CIBJO Blue Book (Official Gemstone Book) states that it must not be cleaned ultrasonically, in any treatment state; the GIA Gem Encyclopedia states that, in any treatment state, warm soapy water with gentle brushing is safest and steam should not be used; Martin's Gemstone Durability: Design to Display states that ultrasonic and steam cleaning should be avoided for untreated Emerald. Heat: the GIA Gem Encyclopedia states that, in any treatment state, heat can damage Emerald, in particular by extending existing fractures. Chemicals: the CIBJO Blue Book (Official Gemstone Book) states that treated Emerald should be kept away from all solvents (including all kinds of detergent), chemicals and high temperatures. Light: the GIA Gem Encyclopedia states that, for treated Emerald and specifically for fracture filling with oil or resin, light and chemicals can alter the appearance of, or age, the oil, resin or polymer used to fill surface-reaching fractures. Wear: the GIA Gem Encyclopedia states that, in any treatment state, at Mohs 7.5–8 it needs more care in wear than ruby or sapphire.
This table scrolls sideways on narrow screens.
Care entries by treatment state
The same entries grouped by the treatment state each applies to; each links to its full wording and source. Letters are CIBJO special-care codes, explained on the gemstone care page.
any treatment state
- Do not soak it in detergent, for the same reason as with ultrasonic cleaning (fillers may be damaged or lost); a soft cloth dampened with water is best
- Warm soapy water with gentle scrubbing is safest; avoid steam, which can draw oil or unhardened resin out of fractures; most emeralds are fracture-filled, and ultrasonic vibration can further weaken a stone that is already fractured
- care (cleaning) §6.2 j
- Heat can harm it, above all by extending existing fractures
- Common sense says not to wear an emerald ring for gardening or other hard physical activity
- Mohs 7.5 to 8 with fair to good toughness, so it needs more care in wear than ruby or sapphire; looked after, it lasts for generations
- cleaves or fractures easily or is brittle (e.g. rubbed facet edges); wear with care §6.2 b
- Check pointed corners closely for durability; such stones are better in earrings, pins or pendants than in rings, to spare the points
untreated
- ultrasonic and steamer: avoid; note: avoid solvents
- prong, bezel and channel: use caution; flush and pavé: avoid; note: heavily included stones or those with liquid inclusions need extra care in any setting
- polishing: use caution; jeweller's torch, pickle pot and thermal shock: avoid; note: avoid heat, which may crack or break it; polishing compound can work into surface-reaching fractures
- heat in the display case, sunlight and artificial light: relatively safe
treated
treated (Only after these treatments: fissure filling with oil, fissure filling with resin)
- Light and chemicals can change the look of the oil, resin or polymer used to fill fractures that reach the surface, or make it deteriorate
- colourless oil, wax or resin in fissures: special care (SC); avoid sudden temperature changes
treated (Only after these treatments: fissure filling with resin)
treated (Only after these treatments: dyeing)
Durability and wearing
Toughness
Fair to good
Sources GIA Gem Encyclopedia (care guide)
Treatments and identification leads
Registered treatmentsThe treatments recorded for Emerald are dyeing, filling and coating. Dyeing has the status colour treated; filling and coating have the status treated. Values not givenStability and prevalence for all three are marked with a dash, meaning the cited source gives no value, not none. Identification cluesAs identification leads, dyeing shows uneven colour distribution under magnification, with colour often concentrated in fractures or surface cavities, indistinct pleochroism and an anomalous UV-visible spectrum. What is seen with filling depends on the filler, with different features for colourless oil, wax or resin; infrared spectroscopy shows the filler's own characteristic absorption bands, and luminescence imaging shows how the filler is distributed. Coating can be detected under magnification by anomalous surface lustre and local peeling of the film; refractive index readings may be abnormal, and infrared and Raman spectroscopy can detect the characteristic peaks of the coating. The cited source is GB/T 16553—2017.
This table scrolls sideways on narrow screens.
| Treatment | Market frequency (CIBJO) | Stability (CIBJO) | GB/T 16552 category | JJA/AGL listing | Identification leads |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dyeingStatus: colour treated | — | — | Treatment | — | See identification leads |
| fillingStatus: treated | — | — | Graded — see §5.4.1, Table 1 | filling | See identification leads |
| coatingStatus: treated | — | — | Treatment | coating | See identification leads |
| impregnation with a colourless agent | — | — | — | impregnation with a colourless agent | — |
| impregnation with a coloured agent | — | — | — | impregnation with a coloured agent | — |
Where each treatment acts (schematics): Dyed · Filled / Fracture-filled · Coated
“—” means the cited source gives no value for that item, not “none”. Source: GB/T 16553—2017; GB/T 16552—2017 Table B.1; JJA/AGL 2025
Whether a treatment has to show in the name differs between the two rule sets (this site’s paraphrase):
- GB/T 16552—2017: a method classed as treatment has to be stated in the name itself — the method put before the name, or added in brackets after it; a method classed as optimization does not need to appear in the name, though one marked “Optimization (annotation required)” still has to be noted in the quality documents. Source: §5.4.2.1 a), b); §5.4.2.2 a)
- CIBJO Gemstone Book 2022: no longer splits treatments into ones that need specific disclosure and ones that need only general disclosure: every treatment is to be disclosed, and the seller tells the buyer which treatment was used and what special care it calls for. Source: §4.2.5 Note 2, §4.2.5.1, pp.14–15
What this table covers
What this page can give
- Registered treatments, their stability and how often they occur (see the table above)
- Identification leads for each treatment, for use when sending a stone for testing
How lab reports word it
Further LMHC wording for this material (identification line, treatment wording, optional comments, durability note) is not itemised on this page; see LMHC information sheet #5 and the LMHC index on the laboratory testing page.
Emerald — how lab reports word it (definition used on reports): the definition used on reports: green mainly from chromium or vanadium, of medium to strong saturation; iron-dominated green beryl with only traces of chromium does not count.
LMHC Information Sheet #5
Definition in the information sheet (original wording): a beryl mainly coloured by chromium and or vanadium showing a medium to strong green saturation
- Case
- when the variety name may be used
Source & check 2026-09-26
- Source
- LMHC Information Sheet #5, Version 6, May 2025 (LMHC): p.1, “Emerald definition” (Information Sheet #5) (locator checked 2026-09-26)
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-26
Emerald — how lab reports word it (treatment wording): The statement covers only the stone as examined; existing fissures could still be filled later.
LMHC Information Sheet #5
Wording on the report: At the time of examination, this gemstone does not show any clarity enhancement.
- Case
- no fissures or no filling
Source & check 2026-09-26
- Source
- LMHC Information Sheet #5, Version 6, May 2025 (LMHC): p.1, “No fissures or No fissure filling” (Information Sheet #5) (locator checked 2026-09-28)
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-26
Emerald — how lab reports word it (treatment wording): a reminder that clarity enhancement can usually be removed or redone at any time, so the report reflects only the stone as examined.
LMHC Information Sheet #5
Wording on the report: Clarity enhancement / modification is usually reversible and repeatable at any time.
- Case
- colourless to near-colourless filler in fissures
Source & check 2026-09-26
- Source
- LMHC Information Sheet #5, Version 6, May 2025 (LMHC): p.1, “Indications of fissure filling” (Information Sheet #5) (locator checked 2026-09-26)
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-26
Emerald — how lab reports word it (extent grades): Fissure filling is graded F1–F3 (minor, moderate, significant), and wide fractures or cavities are graded C1–C3; reports may give the code, the word or both.
LMHC Information Sheet #5
Wording on the report: F1 or minor
- Case
- colourless to near-colourless filler in fissures
Source & check 2026-09-26
- Source
- LMHC Information Sheet #5, Version 6, May 2025 (LMHC): p.2, Tables 1 and 2 (Information Sheet #5) (locator checked 2026-09-28)
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-26
VerifyNames, standards, technical facts, clauses and sources
Names
Standard and listing namesThe Chinese formal name for Emerald is given in GB/T 16552—2017 Table A.1, and the suggested listing name is Emerald. Names in four languagesNames are given in four languages: Simplified Chinese, Traditional Chinese, English (Emerald) and Japanese (a katakana transliteration); Japan's GSJ formal name is written in katakana with a kanji alternative, registered separately from the Japanese form among the four-language names. Trade and mineralogical namesThe mineralogical name is green beryl coloured by chromium or vanadium. Institution usageOn authority wording, GIA, the FTC and CIBJO record Emerald, the CIBJO wording coming from the CIBJO Gemmological Laboratories Book 2024; Gem-A is unchecked, and bodies without a recorded wording show the entry's own English name, which does not represent their position. Qualifier stripped from the title name: for GIA it corresponds to green beryl. National standard namesNational and regional formal names: Germany (RAL) writes Smaragd, the EU writes Emerald, India (BIS) writes Emerald/Panna, Thailand (GIT) writes Emerald/Mora-kot, and France (DGCCRF) writes Émeraude.
- GSJ (Japan) formal name
- エメラルド/翠玉
- Chinese formal name
- 祖母绿 (GB/T 16552—2017 Table A.1)
- Mineralogical name
- Green beryl colored by Cr/V
Four-language names
- 简体中文
- 祖母绿
- 繁體中文
- 祖母綠
- English
- Emerald
- 日本語
- エメラルド
National and regional formal names
- Germany (RAL)
- Smaragd
- European Union
- Emerald
- India (BIS)
- Emerald / Panna (पन्ना)
- Thailand (GIT)
- Emerald / Mora-kot (มรกต)
- France (DGCCRF)
- Émeraude
Qualifiers stripped from the headline name
See also: Misleading and prohibited trade names · Supplementary name index
Classification
- Origin
- Natural materials
- Material domain
- Natural inorganic gem materials
- Browsing family
- Beryl minerals and gem varieties
- Identity tier
- Mineral / gemstone variety
- Mineral chemical class
- Silicates
- Construction or treatment status
- Natural; treatment common (require certificate to distinguish)
Treatments listed by standards
GB/T Table B.1In the Emerald row of GB/T 16552—2017 Annex B, Table B.1, Emerald is listed with: filling, which improves or changes durability and appearance, its category defined by grade; dyeing, which improves or changes colour, in the treatment category; and coating, which improves or changes lustre, colour and other aspects of appearance, in the treatment category. The notes to Table B.1 and the graded definitions of the filling category are on the Gem treatments page. JJA/AGL designationsThe November 2025 revision of the Japanese JJA/AGL Definitions and Nomenclature of Gemstones and Ornamental Materials, in its list of main gemstone designations, places Emerald under the species beryl, with colour green (chromium); the treatments listed are impregnation with a colourless agent, impregnation with a coloured agent, coating and filling, corresponding respectively to filling, filling, coating and filling, plus an item for no sign of impregnation seen, which refers to filling. How to read the JJA/AGL table is explained on the Gem treatments page.
GB/T 16552-2017, Annex B, Table B.1
Table B.1, row “Emerald” (p.14):
This table scrolls sideways on narrow screens.
| Method | Effect | Category |
|---|---|---|
| Filling | Improves or changes durability and appearance | Graded — see §5.4.1, Table 1 |
| Dyeing | Improves or changes colour | Treatment |
| Coating | Improves or changes lustre, colour and other aspects of appearance | Treatment |
What Table B.1 is, and how the “see 5.4.1” grades are defined: see the GB/T 16552: optimization vs treatment page.
JJA/AGL (Japan) table of principal gem names, 2025
This table scrolls sideways on narrow screens.
| Gem name | Species | Colour | Listed in the table | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emerald | Beryl | green (chromium) | the source lists no untreated tier; no indication of impregnation (see Filled / Fracture-filled); impregnation with a colourless agent (Filled / Fracture-filled); impregnation with a coloured agent (Filled / Fracture-filled); coating (Coated); filling (Filled / Fracture-filled) |
JJA/AGL definitions and nomenclature (2025 revision), table of principal gem names, p.16
How to read the JJA/AGL table: see the Gem treatments page.
What it is and how it's identified
Registered material facts for Emerald: chemical composition is Be3Al2Si6O18 with Cr, and Fe, Ti, V and other elements may also be present, the phase being beryl; the structure is crystalline, hexagonal, with a habit commonly of hexagonal prisms; Mohs hardness is 7.5–8 and cleavage is one imperfect direction; density is 2.67–2.9 g/cm³ (clause value 2.72, tolerance +0.18/−0.05, from which the range is derived); refractive index is 1.56–1.6 (clause value 1.577–1.583, tolerance ±0.017, from which the range is derived); birefringence is 0.005–0.009; optical character is anisotropic, uniaxial negative. Untreated Emerald shows moderate to strong pleochroism in bluish green and yellowish green, a body colour of light to dark green, bluish green and yellowish green, and a vitreous lustre; the UV-visible spectrum shows strong absorption peaks at 683nm and 680nm and weak peaks at 662nm and 646nm, with partial absorption at 580~630nm and absorption in the violet region.
Registered material facts
Each row carries its own source and check date and can be cited on its own; “—” means the cited source gives no value, not “none”.
Definition
Emerald — composition (chemistry): Be3Al2Si6O18 with Cr; Fe, Ti, V and other elements may also be present.
GB/T 16553—2017
- Does this standard apply
- applies to this entry
Source & check 2026-09-21
- Source
- GB/T 16553—2017 Gems — Testing (GB/T): §5.1.7 (locator checked 2026-09-21)
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-21
Emerald — composition (phase): beryl
CIBJO Gemmological Laboratories Book 2024
Source & check 2026-09-22
- Source
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-22
Structure
Emerald — structure (overall): crystalline
GB/T 16553—2017
- Does this standard apply
- applies to this entry
Source & check 2026-09-21
- Source
- GB/T 16553—2017 Gems — Testing (GB/T): §5.1.7 (locator checked 2026-09-21)
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-21
Emerald — structure (crystal system): hexagonal
GB/T 16553—2017
- Does this standard apply
- applies to this entry
Source & check 2026-09-21
- Source
- GB/T 16553—2017 Gems — Testing (GB/T): §5.1.7 (locator checked 2026-09-21)
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-21
Emerald — structure (crystal habit): common hexagonal
GB/T 16553—2017
- Does this standard apply
- applies to this entry
Source & check 2026-09-21
- Source
- GB/T 16553—2017 Gems — Testing (GB/T): §5.1.7 (locator checked 2026-09-21)
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-21
Durability
Emerald — Mohs hardness: 7.5–8
GB/T 16553—2017
Reference points on this site: Talc 1–3, Fluorite 4, Apatite 5–5.5, Orthoclase 6–6.5, Topaz 8, Diamond 10 (Source: GB/T 16553—2017); Gypsum 1.5–2, Calcite 3, Quartz 7 (Source: Handbook of Mineralogy); Corundum 9 (Source: GIA Gem Encyclopedia (care guide))
- Does this standard apply
- applies to this entry
- General note
- hardness only, not durability
Source & check 2026-09-21
- Source
- GB/T 16553—2017 Gems — Testing (GB/T): §5.1.7 (locator checked 2026-09-21)
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-21
Emerald — cleavage: imperfect in one direction
GB/T 16553—2017
- Does this standard apply
- applies to this entry
Source & check 2026-09-21
- Source
- GB/T 16553—2017 Gems — Testing (GB/T): §5.1.7 (locator checked 2026-09-21)
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-21
Physical properties
Emerald — density: 2.67–2.9 g/cm³
GB/T 16553—2017
- Does this standard apply
- applies to this entry
- Qualification
The clause we cite gives 2.72, with a stated tolerance of +0.18 / -0.05. The range shown here is worked out from that.
Source & check 2026-09-21
- Source
- GB/T 16553—2017 Gems — Testing (GB/T): §5.1.7 (locator checked 2026-09-21)
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-21
Optical
Emerald — optic character: uniaxial, optically negative (anisotropic)
GB/T 16553—2017
- Does this standard apply
- applies to this entry
Source & check 2026-09-21
- Source
- GB/T 16553—2017 Gems — Testing (GB/T): §5.1.7 (locator checked 2026-09-21)
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-21
Emerald — refractive index: 1.56–1.6
GB/T 16553—2017
- Does this standard apply
- applies to this entry
- Qualification
The clause we cite gives 1.577–1.583, with a stated tolerance of ±0.017. The range shown here is worked out from that.
Source & check 2026-09-21
- Source
- GB/T 16553—2017 Gems — Testing (GB/T): §5.1.7 (locator checked 2026-09-21)
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-21
Emerald — birefringence: 0.005–0.009
GB/T 16553—2017
- Does this standard apply
- applies to this entry
Source & check 2026-09-21
- Source
- GB/T 16553—2017 Gems — Testing (GB/T): §5.1.7 (locator checked 2026-09-21)
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-21
Emerald — pleochroism: blue-green and yellow-green, moderate to strong
GB/T 16553—2017
- Treatment state
- untreated
- Does this standard apply
- applies to this entry
Source & check 2026-09-21
- Source
- GB/T 16553—2017 Gems — Testing (GB/T): §5.1.7 (locator checked 2026-09-21)
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-21
Emerald — fluorescence (overall): generally none; sometimes long wave weak, orange-red, red; sometimes short wave weak, orange-red, red; fluorescence under short wave is usually weaker than under long wave.
GB/T 16553—2017
UV fluorescencesometimes: orange-redredweaksometimes: orange-redredweakDots are illustrative colours built from the colour names, not measured values
- Treatment state
- untreated
- Does this standard apply
- applies to this entry
Source & check 2026-09-21
- Source
- GB/T 16553—2017 Gems — Testing (GB/T): §5.1.7 (locator checked 2026-09-21)
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-21
Emerald — spectrum (UV-visible): 683 nm strong absorption peak; 680 nm strong absorption peak; 662 nm weak absorption peak; 646 nm weak absorption peak; 580~630 nm partial absorption band; absorption in the violet region.
GB/T 16553—2017
- Does this standard apply
- applies to this entry
Source & check 2026-09-21
- Source
- GB/T 16553—2017 Gems — Testing (GB/T): §5.1.7 (locator checked 2026-09-21)
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-21
Emerald — spectrum (infrared): Diagnostic mid-IR bands arise from Si-O and similar groups in beryl; emerald that has been filled or clarity-enhanced departs from natural emerald in its functional-group-region bands.
GB/T 16553—2017
- Does this standard apply
- applies to this entry
Source & check 2026-09-22
- Source
- GB/T 16553—2017 Gems — Testing (GB/T): §5.1.7 (locator checked 2026-09-22)
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-22
Emerald — optical effect (chatoyancy): seen
GB/T 16553—2017
- Does this standard apply
- applies to this entry
Source & check 2026-09-21
- Source
- GB/T 16553—2017 Gems — Testing (GB/T): §5.1.7 (locator checked 2026-09-21)
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-21
Emerald — optical effect (asterism): seen; rare
GB/T 16553—2017
- Does this standard apply
- applies to this entry
Source & check 2026-09-21
- Source
- GB/T 16553—2017 Gems — Testing (GB/T): §5.1.7 (locator checked 2026-09-21)
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-21
Emerald — magnification: gas-liquid inclusions, three-phase inclusions, mineral inclusions, growth striations, color band, grown crack.
GB/T 16553—2017
- Treatment state
- untreated
- Does this standard apply
- applies to this entry
Source & check 2026-09-21
- Source
- GB/T 16553—2017 Gems — Testing (GB/T): §5.1.7 (locator checked 2026-09-21)
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-21
body colour2 sources compared
Emerald — body colour: light to dark green, blue-green and yellow-green.
GB/T 16553—2017
- Treatment state
- untreated
- Does this standard apply
- applies to this entry
- Qualification
The colours GB/T 16553—2017 lists for Synthetic Emerald overlap with this entry: green, blue-green and yellow-green.
- General note
- colour alone is not identity
Source & check 2026-09-26
- Source
- GB/T 16553—2017 Gems — Testing (GB/T): §5.1.7 (locator checked 2026-09-26)
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-26
Emerald — body colour: green.
CIBJO Gemmological Laboratories Book 2024
- Treatment state
- untreated
- Qualification
In chapter 7 of the CIBJO Gemmological Laboratories Book, the colour descriptions of Aventurine Quartz, Diopside, Spodumene and other entries also name green or a greenish colour.
- General note
- colour alone is not identity
Source & check 2026-09-22
- Source
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-22
How the sources relate
- GB/T 16553—2017 and CIBJO Gemmological Laboratories Book 2024
Both describe emerald as green; GB/T 16553—2017 adds the range from light to dark green as well as blue-green and yellow-green.
- CIBJO definitions
- chatoyancy, asterism
Quality factors
Emerald — quality factor (lustre): vitreous
GB/T 16553—2017
- Treatment state
- untreated
- Does this standard apply
- applies to this entry
Source & check 2026-09-21
- Source
- GB/T 16553—2017 Gems — Testing (GB/T): §5.1.7 (locator checked 2026-09-21)
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-21
Each row's “Source & check” expands to the full source; the date beside it is the fact check date.
This material (RI / SG midpoints): 1.58 / 2.79; Closest values: 1Qingtian Stone 1.565 / 2.77, 2Natural Conch Pearl / Natural Melo Pearl 1.595 / 2.84, 3Calcite 1.572 / 2.7, 4Brucite 1.57 / 2.89, 5Synthetic Emerald 1.565 / 2.69
Show the full chart (330 registered materials)
Outside the full chart's range, drawn as triangles at the edge (RI / SG midpoints): Hematite 3.045/5.12, Synthetic Rutile 2.76/4.26, Rutile 2.753/4.23, Synthetic Moissanite 2.67/3.22
Testing and market
The identification leads for dyed Emerald are: under magnification the colour is unevenly distributed, often concentrated in fractures or surface pits; pleochroism is indistinct; and the UV-visible spectrum is abnormal. For filled Emerald, the leads depend on the filler: colourless oil can be seen under magnification in surface-reaching fractures, fluoresces yellowish green or greenish yellow under long-wave UV, and may sweat out on contact with a thermal needle; resin fillers show a lustre different from the host where exposed at the surface, with flashes and gas bubbles visible; the infrared spectrum can detect characteristic bands of the filler, and luminescence imaging can show the filler's distribution. For coated Emerald, magnification shows abnormal surface lustre and local peeling of the film, refractive index readings may be abnormal, and infrared and Raman spectra can detect characteristic peaks of the coating. The GB/T 16553—2017 identification leads for dyeing, filling and coating can only be used as a reference for Emerald and do not govern it directly. The CIBJO laboratory protocol requires particular checks for clarity enhancement (including filling of cavities and wide fractures), synthetics, coating and dyeing; Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy distinguishes synthetic from natural and identifies fillers, while Raman spectroscopy only identifies fillers.
The tests the CIBJO laboratory protocol requires for this material, and what each method means, are in the protocol table on the laboratory testing page: §6.1.30.
How far testing can go
Emerald that has undergone dyeing can be identified by the following features: Under magnification the colour is unevenly distributed and mostly concentrated between fissures or in surface hollows; there is no obvious pleochroism; the UV-visible spectrum looks abnormal.
GB/T 16553—2017
- Treatment state
- colour treated
- Does this standard apply
- can be followed as a reference only
- Treatment
- dyeing
Source & check 2026-09-21
- Source
- GB/T 16553—2017 Gems — Testing (GB/T): §5.1.7 (dyeing) (locator checked 2026-09-21)
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-21
Emerald that has undergone filling can be identified by the following features: What is seen depends on the filler. Colorless oil: magnification finds it in fissures reaching the surface; the oil is mostly colorless to pale yellow, may glow yellow-green or green-yellow under long-wave ultraviolet light, and may exude when touched with a hot point.
Wax: it may exude when touched with a hot point. Resin: magnification shows that the exposed part of the filler differs in surface lustre from the host gem, with flash and bubbles visible where the filling sits. Beyond that, infrared spectroscopy reveals the characteristic infrared absorption bands of the filler, and luminescence imaging (an ultraviolet fluorescence viewer, for instance) shows how the filler is distributed.
GB/T 16553—2017
- Treatment state
- treated
- Does this standard apply
- can be followed as a reference only
- Treatment
- filling
Source & check 2026-09-22
- Source
- GB/T 16553—2017 Gems — Testing (GB/T): §5.1.7 (filling) (locator checked 2026-09-22)
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-22
Emerald that has undergone coating can be identified by the following features: Under magnification the surface luster is abnormal and the film can be seen peeling off in places; refractive index readings may be abnormal, and infrared and Raman spectra show characteristic peaks of the film.
GB/T 16553—2017
- Treatment state
- treated
- Does this standard apply
- can be followed as a reference only
- Treatment
- coating
Source & check 2026-09-21
- Source
- GB/T 16553—2017 Gems — Testing (GB/T): §5.1.7 (coating) (locator checked 2026-09-21)
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-21
Emerald — criteria for distinction from other varieties: green colour due to chromium and vanadium.
CIBJO Gemmological Laboratories Book 2024
- Treatment state
- untreated
Source & check 2026-09-22
- Source
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-22
Emerald — what the CIBJO laboratory protocol says to watch for: clarity enhancement (also cavity and wide fracture filling), synthetics, coating and dye.
CIBJO Gemmological Laboratories Book 2024
- Treatment state
- any treatment state
Source & check 2026-09-26
- Source
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-26
Emerald — notes on test methods in the CIBJO laboratory protocol:
| Test method | What the protocol notes for it |
|---|---|
| Phenomena: | Star, Cat’s-eye, trapiche; |
| UV-Visible(-NIR) spectroscopy: | Origin; |
| FTIR(-NIR) spectroscopy: | Synthetic/natural and filler ID; |
| EDXRF chemistry: | Origin; |
| Raman spectroscopy: | Only for filler ID; |
| LA-ICP-MS Chemistry: | If necessary for origin |
CIBJO Gemmological Laboratories Book 2024
- Treatment state
- any treatment state
Source & check 2026-09-26
- Source
- Fact checked on
- 2026-09-26
Each row's “Source & check” expands to the full source; the date beside it is the fact check date.
Clause-level definitions
Emerald has a direct definition in the CIBJO Gemmological Laboratories Book 2024 under the term Emerald, defined as the green variety of beryl, that is, green beryl. The cross-check for Emerald shows it is defined directly by CIBJO and also appears in the GB/T annex; GB/T 16552—2017 Annex A, Table A.1 also lists this material under the name Emerald.
This table scrolls sideways on narrow screens.
| Term | Clause | Definition | Cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Emerald | 7.2.1.82 | green variety of beryl | Defined directly by CIBJO; also present in the GB/T annex. |
Evidence and sources
Authority basis and clause sources
Sources
Further reading
Recorded cultural contexts
The U.S. Jewelers of America roster lists Emerald for May; the U.K. National Association of Jewellers chart lists Emerald as traditional for May; and Japan's JJA 2021 revised roster lists Emerald for May. This records trade-association convention only; it does not establish material identity, natural origin, treatment, provenance, or effect.
This table scrolls sideways on narrow screens.
| Publisher or holder | Region | From / period | Source and locator |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jewelers of America | United States | 1912 to the present | Jewelers of America, “Birthstone Jewelry” (web page, consulted 2026-08-22) Birthstone roster table, May row: Emerald |
| Japan Jewellery Association | Japan | from 20 December 2021 | Tanjoseki (Japanese birthstone roster, Japan Jewellery Association page; revision of 20 December 2021) 2021 revised birthstone roster, May row: Emerald |
| National Association of Jewellers | United Kingdom | — | National Association of Jewellers, “Zodiac Birthstones Jewellery: Star Signs, Gemstones and Their Meaning” (web page, consulted 2026-08-22) Zodiac birthstone chart, May row: Emerald (Traditional) |
Related entries and topic cluster
Parent entry and related pages on this site. Rows marked “Planned” are suggested new content and have no link yet.
Related-entry tree for Beryl on this site: 11 entries listed by this site's parent-entry links; synthetic, treated and similar entries carry their recorded state after the name; this page (Emerald) is marked.
- Beryl
Sub-entries (9)
- Aquamarine
- Colombian Emerald
- Emerald
Sub-entries (1)
- Synthetic Emerald (Synthetic product)
- Goshenite
- Heliodor / Golden Beryl
- Maxixe Beryl
- Morganite
- Red Beryl
- Zambian Emerald
This table scrolls sideways on narrow screens.
| Page | Content | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Browsing family | Beryl minerals and gem varieties | Live |
| Treatments recorded for this material | Filled / Fracture-filled, Dyed, Coated | Live |
| Related articles | To be added (placeholder) | Planned |
Who maintains this page
The material facts in the Emerald entry are maintained by the LumaLark wiki and matched one by one to the standard clauses or institutional sources they cite: every fact carries its source (with a clause or page locator) and a check date, so it can be traced back to the original; clause-level definitions also carry a cross-check result. The entry exists so that buyers and sellers can check naming, disclosure and material facts item by item.